While Minneapolis has featured groomed CC Ski trails such as north Wirth's golf course front nine and back nine loops for years, the expanded trail network from north Wirth to uptown began a few years ago with John Munger's dream to make Minneapolis a CC Ski Mecca by creating the City Of Lakes Loppet ski marathon. This has resulted in expanded ski trails through what used to be fairly quiet wooded areas surrounding Eloise Butler wildflower gardens and the Quaking Bog.
These expanded trails, featuring more numerous (and wider) skiing/hiking loops have cut a swath through what was a well-kept secret of Bryn Mawr residents, bordering Eloise Butler in particular. When you combine this with the Park Board's multi-year campaign to rid these parks of Buckthorn, south Wirth has really thinned out in the last couple of years.
Many residents feel it's irrevocably changing the nature of this practically wild habitat, and threatening rare vegetation. They have directed much of their frustration at what they perceive to be a skier conspiracy to strip-mine south Wirth of buckthorn in order to lay wide switchbacks of skate ski groomed trails. The Southwest Journal recently reported on The Controversy
Why these residents (banded together as the Friends of the Wildflower Garden) have taken such a hard-line with the Nordic Ski Foundation escapes me. Even after the multiple use groups like the Nordic Ski Foundation, area residents and mountain bikers all attempted to reach a consensus on use and seemed to reach agreement on keeping potential trails away from the flower gardens, their stated goal is to remove all nordic trails from south Wirth.
They raise two principal points, as I see it:
- Wide trails have cut through old growth vegetation and threaten rare species, and,
- Nordic trails and usage has scared off local fauna
As to wildlife, I fail to see how it's use by skiiers would be markedly different from any other non-motorized use in terms of threatening local wildlife. I use a variety of the region's trail systems to ski, hike and run and cannot fathom why people would think that this type of usage would materially impact local wildlife. Anyone who's had to shoo turkeys, deer and coyote out of the way when they are trail running or skiing would agree with me.
It seems the Friends of the Wildflower Garden have misdirected their anger here and are bit ignorant of the ski community. It is one of the most genteel, gracious, environmentally friendly recreation groups you can come across.
Check out my local video of skiing Wirth on Christmas (footage here from the connector section from JD Gardens and the south Wirth areas back to Front Nine):
Look at those guys! Just the picture of gentility.
4 comments:
Maybe I'm oversimplifying things waaay too much here, but it seems to me like this is a classic case of people resisting change. The reaction of the Community InnerCity Wildflower Power (or whatever they call themselves) seems to be emotional more than logical or rational. The park looked a certain way for decades, had a nice low population density for a long time. And now that's changing. Is it that simple?
By the way, cool blog. Welcome aboard.
xoxoxo
-Mike N.
Are they seriously complaining about buckthorn removal? Is the group just semi-stupid or just plain stupid???
Well, in all fairness, I think they see the buckthorn removal as a canvass for putting in ski trails. They'd like to see planting follow on the tails of removal.
And yes, I do believe they've been in a state of shock that other folks in town have now started using their little nook. They've oblivious to the potential boon recreational use their could create to the overall park system. Trail use permits for the city (covering all nordic trails) is $25 for a season permit. When we asked last week about when the permits would be ready for printing, they said there is a backlog of over a thousand so far for the new printers. So, over $25,000 generated in December alone for seaon holders. This was primarily supposed to cover snowmaking at Wirth, which they've not had to do (other than laying equipment). The potential for this area is huge.
I still don't think they understand buckthorn removal--if you keep at it, the natural MN woodland will follow. However, if they only removed buckthorn on the path they are using, I can somewhat understand their complaint. However, some buckthorn removal is better than no buckthorn removal!
Post a Comment